Wet Color Printing
I got my “real” start in photography in high school, when I took a photography class and spent many untold hours in the wet darkroom, producing prints from my black and white negatives. I spent many years working with film, but jumped into digital quite early, and for the most part haven’t looked back.
While I had spent many hours working in a wet black and white darkroom, I had never actually printed in a color wet darkroom. In fact, I had never even set foot in a color wet darkroom. I knew about it in theory, but not in practice. Last week I decided it was time to change that.
I’m the president of the Board of Directors at Photographic Center Northwest (PCNW) in Seattle. PCNW offers a wide range of classes (including a certificate program) and workshops, which include both film and digital courses. As a member of the Board I’ve given tremendous thought to what the future of the school should be. That includes thinking about how (or whether) we continue offering color wet darkroom classes and lab rental, when digital has obviously taken over photography in many ways.
I decided I needed to have a better perspective on just what it was we had to offer, so I enlisted the help of one of the faculty, Seth Thompson (www.seththompson.com), to show me how the process worked.
This proved to be an incredible experience that took me back to much of the joy of working in a wet black and white darkroom. Granted, it lacks the ability to see the image coming up on the paper as it soaks in the developer, but the magic of exposing the paper from a negative is still there.
Now, I’m not going to give up on digital and go back to film photography and printing. I feel digital simply has so much more to offer in the way of flexibility that I’d have a difficult time giving it up. But I do have a new appreciation for the process of produding color prints from film, and plan to dig out my old black and white negatives and spend some time in the lab at PCNW to relive some of the fun I used to have before digital.
If you have an opportunity to produce prints like this from film, I highly recommend it. Even if, like me, you’re commited to digital, there is a certain magic to the processes that served photography for so many years.
There aren’t too many places where you can still make your own color prints from film, so if you have the interest I’d suggest you do it soon. If you’re anywhere near the Seattle area you can review the course offerings at PCNW, and if not hopefully you can find a similar facility near you.
So, do you think wet darkrooms should be kept around for those who still appreciate what it has to offer, or is it time to give up the ghost and stick with digital? I think you might be surprised how many photographers aren’t yet ready to dive into digital. Now I have a better appreciation for their perspective.
Explore posts in the same categories: Printing, Film, Philosophical
March 3rd, 2008 at 12:18 pm
Interesting Post…
I grew up, like you, playing with the “magic” of Silver Halide, and at times, i still miss the smell of Fixer
For almost 19 years, i made Type R prints from slides professionally, and there are some days when I do miss that. I am still in the field professionally, but my business has gone from a product-based business to an education-based business.
Truth is, you can still make Silver Halide prints from digital files (in some ways, the best of both worlds) with output from a LightJet, Durst Lambda, Chromira, etc…And yes, this is a bit of a “shameless plug” as I still offer these services..
One of the things that I LOVE about the Digital Realm (from a printing standpoint) is the plethora of choices that it has to offer - -Canvas and Fine Art papers on Inkjet printers, or LightJet output on sensitometric photographic paper,etc.
I truly wish that all of the younger folks getting into photography for the first time would have the chance to explore Silver Halide - i believe it would make them better photographers and “photoshoppers”…
Cheers,
John
March 6th, 2008 at 10:49 am
I have recently taken up printing color in the darkroom. I find I can get a 20×24 print much faster and cheaper from 4×5 film in the darkroom than if I were to buy a 24″ printer. if the negative is well exposed and doesn’t need a lot of manipulation the quality is superb, and is certainly the equal of anything I can do with drum scanning and printing digitally. Digital shines for images that need a lot of manipulation.
Where 4×5 and medium format film is to cumbersome I like digital SLRs over 35mm, at least when shooting color.
For black and white I have yet to be impressed with digital output, though it keeps getting better.
So I still plan on finishing my new darkroom, which will be for both color and b&w. I think you need to keep the color darkroom open, even if it doesn’t make tons of money. I learned a lot starting the darkroom work that has carried over into digital imaging as well.
March 18th, 2008 at 4:05 am
I have worked as a color printer in a pro lab in the 80’s. Today all of my color work is printed digitally. On the other hand all of my black and white is wet printed, taking it one step further all of my Black and White images since 2000 have bee and will continue to be made on 4X5 film.
March 13th, 2010 at 8:30 am
Please keep the color printing machine and darkrooms at PCNW. A class with Seth Thompson is a real experience in color printing and color theory, a topic not easily taught using photoshop. Learning to print analog color will really help you in your digital work as well.