<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Found Photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timgrey.com/blog/2008/found-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timgrey.com/blog/2008/found-photos/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Photography, Digital Imaging, and Travel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:00:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryn</title>
		<link>http://timgrey.com/blog/2008/found-photos/#comment-1394</link>
		<dc:creator>bryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timgrey.com/blog/?p=22#comment-1394</guid>
		<description>I agree that human consistency foils many a plan. I definitely like the serendipity of finding what I wasn&#039;t looking for as well. Though I have to say faster loading/browsing of thumbnails would be nice, as would the ability to quickly dispatch groups of things (like I know I&#039;m not looking for anything in this sub folder, or don&#039;t show me anything that has a metadata taken date before x/x/0x but show me all the ones that don&#039;t have a date). It seems like GPUs could be leveraged for faster scaling of images when you want to see more than a thumbnail, and on 64 bit machines with lots of memory, why can&#039;t we have it load all thumbnails in to memory while we are going to get coffee?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that human consistency foils many a plan. I definitely like the serendipity of finding what I wasn&#8217;t looking for as well. Though I have to say faster loading/browsing of thumbnails would be nice, as would the ability to quickly dispatch groups of things (like I know I&#8217;m not looking for anything in this sub folder, or don&#8217;t show me anything that has a metadata taken date before x/x/0x but show me all the ones that don&#8217;t have a date). It seems like GPUs could be leveraged for faster scaling of images when you want to see more than a thumbnail, and on 64 bit machines with lots of memory, why can&#8217;t we have it load all thumbnails in to memory while we are going to get coffee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art</title>
		<link>http://timgrey.com/blog/2008/found-photos/#comment-1366</link>
		<dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timgrey.com/blog/?p=22#comment-1366</guid>
		<description>I certainly concur with the nature of your &quot;browsing&quot; experience.  Any archive/retrieval program I ever run into always seems to be able to be defeated by simple human inconsistency.  That is, our &quot;mood of the moment&quot; often influences any structure (metadata if you prefer) that might be applied to our images.  As you described, our general forgetfulness leaves a gapping hole in our ability to summon and retrieve each and any image we have ever archived.  In the end we all need to resort to the basic &quot;shoebox storage search&quot; from time to time.

What are our options for a simple shoebox search?  I&#039;ve seen a couple applications that contain similarities that might be leveraged for such a purpose:  the Picasa revolving rolodex for folders and the Vista &quot;window scroll [Cntrl Tab].&quot;  It seems that rapid scanning of &quot;thumbnails&quot; might be achievable with the hardware/software resources of today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly concur with the nature of your &#8220;browsing&#8221; experience.  Any archive/retrieval program I ever run into always seems to be able to be defeated by simple human inconsistency.  That is, our &#8220;mood of the moment&#8221; often influences any structure (metadata if you prefer) that might be applied to our images.  As you described, our general forgetfulness leaves a gapping hole in our ability to summon and retrieve each and any image we have ever archived.  In the end we all need to resort to the basic &#8220;shoebox storage search&#8221; from time to time.</p>
<p>What are our options for a simple shoebox search?  I&#8217;ve seen a couple applications that contain similarities that might be leveraged for such a purpose:  the Picasa revolving rolodex for folders and the Vista &#8220;window scroll [Cntrl Tab].&#8221;  It seems that rapid scanning of &#8220;thumbnails&#8221; might be achievable with the hardware/software resources of today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

